Search found 92 matches
- 21 Jan 2014, 16:09
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: A Geographic Model for Disaffection
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1270
Re: A Geographic Model for Disaffection
hawkgrrrl, this is just awesome. There are only minor points where my situation would be much different than yours. One might be in the Extended Family category. I have been noticing an increasing urge to find some way to just spill the beans to all of them. Let them know where I stand. Part of this...
- 21 Jan 2014, 10:02
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Going Public?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 1304
Re: Going Public?
Thanks for pointing this out. This is what I meant when I referred to sharing things on Facebook (posting things for only those I've networked with).Daeruin wrote:I have a Facebook account, but almost never share anything publicly. Only my friends get to see my posts.
- 20 Jan 2014, 16:06
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Going Public?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 1304
Re: Going Public?
I have been in a position to be part of the hiring process for quite a few years now, and I regularly Google candidates. I would not use religion against them, but I've seen some things that absolutely influenced final decisions. Understood, and I think it's an extremely valid point that we should ...
- 20 Jan 2014, 13:48
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Going Public?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 1304
Re: Going Public?
I am in the process of applying for a job with the church right now. I wouldn't want them reading about my faith crisis at all. I hear the church can be good to work for, so I hope you find what you need. I know we're all in different places, but I don't think I could work for the church right now ...
- 20 Jan 2014, 11:59
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Going Public?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 1304
Re: Going Public?
I have a "corporate" reputation that matters too. I don't really want my clients and colleagues to stumble across it. That is a VERY important thing to consider. It's not all about church members and family. For many people, their job matters a lot in things like this. I'm not trying to be combativ...
- 19 Jan 2014, 18:50
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Going Public?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 1304
Going Public?
Hi everyone, As I had said in my last post, I've been off the radar for a little while. I hope everyone is doing well. I know a lot of you blog because I've seen many of your blogs. I recently decided to join the blogging ranks for various reasons. What I would like to know from all you bloggers is,...
- 19 Dec 2013, 04:28
- Forum: Support
- Topic: Extremely discouraged with religion
- Replies: 8
- Views: 791
Re: Extremely discouraged with religion
No worries Ann. Thank you.
- 18 Dec 2013, 21:45
- Forum: Support
- Topic: Extremely discouraged with religion
- Replies: 8
- Views: 791
Extremely discouraged with religion
I have wanted so badly for the church to be something that I believe to have been divinely established and divinely led, but I just don't. I am reading Rough Stone Rolling to finally try to get to know Joseph Smith. The more I get to know of his life story, however, the more I start to feel like he ...
- 18 Dec 2013, 19:25
- Forum: History and Doctrine Discussions
- Topic: Race and The Priesthood
- Replies: 98
- Views: 6726
Re: Race and The Priesthood
Alex, it is referred to as "policy" and not "doctrine" because David O. McKay said it was policy and not doctrine in 1954 - after the 1947 statement - after (can't believe I'm drawing a blank on the name of the brother) a historian compiled evidence that it didn't start with Joseph Smith or a revel...
- 18 Dec 2013, 18:18
- Forum: History and Doctrine Discussions
- Topic: Plural Marriage and Families in Early Utah
- Replies: 47
- Views: 2235
Re: Plural Marriage and Families in Early Utah
And then there's this: Church leaders viewed plural marriage as a command to the Church generally, while recognizing that individuals who did not enter the practice could still stand approved of God. Women were free to choose their spouses, whether to enter into a polygamous or monogamous union, or ...